Looking Up

Arguments in favor of bigness
by Michael Koresky and Jeff Reichert   posted Nov 10, 2011

Back to Article

COMMENTS (1)

This is just trite film/lit theory, filtered through very primitive minds like Bazin and Koolhaas, one who theorized in the 50's, the other reached his peak in the 90's. The only discussion is neurological (it's not even an issue for psychology, the data has evolved), and only cognitive scientists who study motion are applicable. Save the mumbo jumbo for academia. This is the real world, guys.
slime_whitman   posted 12.12.11

Add Comment

You must sign in to add comments...

LATEST ARTICLES

<em>Land Ho!</em>’s Martha Stephens and Aaron Katz

Land Ho!’s M…
by Eric Hynes et. al
posted July 23, 2014

It Doesn't Suck

It Doesn't Suck
by Adam Nayman
posted June 11, 2014

Going to Extremes

Going to Extremes
by Imogen Sara Smith
posted April 15, 2014

<em>Manakamana</em>’s Stephanie Spray and Pacho Velez

Manakamana’s…
by Eric Hynes et. al
posted May 14, 2014

More
Photofest
Omar Sharif and Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia, directed by David Lean
Photo Gallery: Looking Up
Video: See It Big

RELATED CALENDAR ENTRY

October 28, 2011–March 17, 2012 See It Big!

THE AUTHORS

More articles by Michael Koresky

Jeff Reichert is co-founder and editor of Reverse Shot, as well as the director of three films: Gerrymandering (2010), Remote Area Medical (2013), and This Time Next Year (2014).

More articles by Jeff Reichert